Connecticut Appellate Court· 4/17/2012
Curtis v. Curtis
Citations
- 41 A.3d 318
- 134 Conn. App. 833
- 2012 WL 1172165
- 2012 Conn. App. LEXIS 184
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- refusing to review unpreserved claim that court failed to apply unclean hands doctrine
- ‘‘[i]t is well settled that this court cannot review a claim that is advanced for the first time on appeal and not raised before the trial court’’ (internal quotation marks omitted)
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Gruendel, Robinson, Borden
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
2 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. GoldingSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1989-12-19· cited 2,736×
- Batte-Holmgren v. Commissioner of Public HealthSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2007-02-13· cited 68×
- Kaczynski v. KaczynskiSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2009-11-10· cited 35×
- McBurney v. CirilloSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2006-01-24· cited 29×
- Emigrant Mortg., Co., Inc. v. D'AgostinoConnecticut Appellate Court· 2006-04-18· cited 22×
- GMAC Mortgage Corp. v. GlennConnecticut Appellate Court· 2007-08-14· cited 11×
- Balaska v. BalaskaConnecticut Appellate Court· 2011-08-02· cited 10×
- Liberti v. LibertiConnecticut Appellate Court· 2012-01-10· cited 8×
- Jungnelius v. JungneliusConnecticut Appellate Court· 2012-01-31· cited 6×
- In Re Sarah S.Connecticut Appellate Court· 2008-09-30· cited 5×
- Musolino v. MusolinoConnecticut Appellate Court· 2010-06-08· cited 3×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.