Skip to main content

Curtis v. Commonwealth

Citations

  • 352 S.E.2d 536
  • 3 Va. App. 636
  • 3 Va. Law Rep. 1766
  • 1987 Va. App. LEXIS 150

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • whether the probative value outweighs the prejudicial effect is a decision for the trial judge
  • evidence of prior rapes which were “so unusual and distinctive as to act as a signature” was admissible to prove identity of defendant as perpetrator in a rape case with “overwhelming similarities”
  • evidence of prior rapes which were \so unusual and distinctive as to act as a signature\ was admissible to prove identity of defendant as perpetrator in a rape case with \overwhelming similarities\
  • evidence of prior rapes which were “so unusual and distinctive as to act as a signature” was admissible to prove identity of defendant as perpetrator in a rape case with “overwhelming similarities”
  • evidence of prior rapes which were \so unusual and distinctive as to act as a signature\ was admissible to prove identity of defendant as perpetrator in a rape case with \overwhelming similarities\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Moon

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

13 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.