Curtis Nottingham v. Kanawha County Board of Education

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that state prisoners challenging the execution of a state sentence cannot use § 2241
• holding that a challenge to a classification affecting a state prisoner’s parole eligibility is governed by § 2254
• holding that such claims required prisoner to obtain prefiling authorization to file second or successive ha-beas petition
• holding that state prisoners challenging the execution of a state sentence, including the loss of good time credits, cannot use § 2241
• holding that a convicted state prisoner challenging the execution of his sentence is required to apply for authorization to file a second or successive habeas application
• holding that petitions challenging the execution of a state sentence must be filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 and are subject to “all associated statutory requirements”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).