Ninth Circuit· 12/15/2015
Curtis Morrison v. Mark Peterson
Citations
- 809 F.3d 1059
- 2015 U.S. App. LEXIS 21669
- 2015 WL 8756229
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that Rooker-Feldman doctrine did not bar as-applied challenge to California’s post-conviction DNA testing statute where plaintiff sought to invalidate the statute as unconstitutional but did not seek an order granting DNA testing
- considering both facial and as- applied challenges, though pro se litigant characterized his challenge as only as-applied
- rejecting facial challenge to § 1405’s “reasonable probability” and “chain of custody” requirements
- California petitioner has a constitutionally 2 protected liberty interest in petitioning for habeas corpus
- involving a similar challenge brought against a district attorney
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: O'Scannlain, Smith, Morris
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
7 cases in this archive cite this case.
- George Young, Jr. v. State of HawaiiNinth Circuit· 2021-03-24· cited 43×
- Seanlim Yith v. Kirstjen NielsenNinth Circuit· 2018-02-07· cited 29×
- State v. LeggSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2016-04-20· cited 16×
- Washington v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2016-11-01· cited 11×
- Ray Cromartie v. Bradfield Shealy, Randa WhartonEleventh Circuit· 2019-10-30· cited 10×
- Stacey Johnson v. Tim GriffinEighth Circuit· 2023-06-05· cited 10×
- Stephen Redd v. Patricia GuerreroNinth Circuit· 2023-10-20· cited 10×
Cites
23 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- United States v. SalernoSupreme Court· 1987-05-26· cited 5,104×
- Exxon Mobil Corp. v. Saudi Basic Industries Corp.Supreme Court· 2005-03-30· cited 4,974×
- Pennsylvania v. FinleySupreme Court· 1987-05-18· cited 3,807×
- House v. BellSupreme Court· 2006-06-12· cited 2,367×
- Washington State Grange v. Washington State Republican PartySupreme Court· 2008-03-18· cited 1,365×
- Skinner v. SwitzerSupreme Court· 2011-03-07· cited 1,318×
- Medina v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 1992-06-22· cited 1,180×
- Eric Noel v. Brian C. Hall Sandra A. Hall, Fka Sandra Johnson, and Gabrielle S. Lennartz Herb Weisser Michelle A. MerchantNinth Circuit· 2003-09-02· cited 905×
- District Attorney's Office for the Third Judicial District v. OsborneSupreme Court· 2009-06-18· cited 782×
- Connecticut Board of Pardons v. DumschatSupreme Court· 1981-06-17· cited 728×
- Kevin Cooper v. Michael RamosNinth Circuit· 2012-12-27· cited 285×
- People v. DiazCalifornia Supreme Court· 1992-08-31· cited 254×
- City of L. A. v. PatelSupreme Court· 2015-06-22· cited 240×
- John R. Stone v. The Travelers CorporationNinth Circuit· 1995-06-22· cited 152×
- Richardson v. Superior Court of Tulare CountyCalifornia Supreme Court· 2008-05-22· cited 90×
- Angel Lopez-Valenzuela v. County of MaricopaNinth Circuit· 2014-10-15· cited 79×
- Curtis Lee Morrison v. Wayne EstelleNinth Circuit· 1992-12-03· cited 78×
- In Re WeberCalifornia Supreme Court· 1974-06-20· cited 68×
- Rose v. HudsonCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2007-07-24· cited 12×
- In Re AntiliaCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2009-08-11· cited 8×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.