Curtis Morrison v. Mark Peterson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that Rooker-Feldman doctrine did not bar as-applied challenge to California’s post-conviction DNA testing statute where plaintiff sought to invalidate the statute as unconstitutional but did not seek an order granting DNA testing
• considering both facial and as- applied challenges, though pro se litigant characterized his challenge as only as-applied
• rejecting facial challenge to § 1405’s “reasonable probability” and “chain of custody” requirements
• California petitioner has a constitutionally 2 protected liberty interest in petitioning for habeas corpus
• involving a similar challenge brought against a district attorney

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).