CURTIS GOLDING v. FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• rational jury could find defendant had committed arson in part because there was evidence that defendant had motive to collect on life insurance policy
• gasoline on defendant's sweatpants supported finding that fire was intentionally set
• judicial bad faith will not easily be inferred
• declining to reach question resolved in Phim

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).