Skip to main content
· 6/28/2001

Curt M. Read v. United States

Citations

  • 254 F.3d 1064
  • 2001 U.S. App. LEXIS 14323
  • 2001 WL 721401

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding that “[MSPB] review [is] the exclusive statutory procedure by which employees may challenge their removal”
  • stating only the MSPB is authorized to review removals of federal employees
  • “[O]nly the [MSPB], not the [CFC], is authorized to review remov- als of federal employees.”
  • “only the Merit Systems Protection Board, and not the Court of Federal Claims, is authorized to review removals of federal employees”
  • Court of Federal Claims lacks jurisdiction over claims for back pay stemming from agency’s adverse personnel action

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Mayer, Friedman, Rader

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.