Skip to main content
· 2/26/2003

Curry v. Thornsberry

Citations

  • 98 S.W.3d 477
  • 81 Ark. App. 112
  • 2003 Ark. App. LEXIS 152

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • rejecting argument that statute of repose should be tolled for fraudulent concealment where prior owners knew of or discovered defects allegedly concealed
  • “The notice of a prior purchaser of defects in the construction of the house is imputed to the subsequent purchaser and bars the subsequent purchaser’s action for negligence or breach of implied warranties.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Larry D. Vaught

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.