Skip to main content
· 12/12/1995

Curry v. Moody

Citations

  • 40 Cal. App. 4th 1547
  • 48 Cal. Rptr. 2d 627
  • 95 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 9556
  • 95 Daily Journal DAR 16550
  • 1995 Cal. App. LEXIS 1217

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • extrinsic evidence only admissible to prove meaning of ambiguous term that is reasonably susceptible to the proffered interpretation
  • extrinsic evidence only admissible to prove meaning of ambiguous term that is reasonably susceptible to the proffered interpretation
  • “[A]s a matter of law an ambiguous contract cannot be construed to provide for compound interest.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Johnson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.