Curry v. Interstate Express, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “In the last analysis, it is the reserved right of control rather than its actual exercise that provides the answer.”
• finding Interstate controlled payment where Interstate determined percentage driver received

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cites

16 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Ex Parte Eastwood Foods, Inc.
  Supreme Court of Alabama· 1991-01-11· cited 292×
• Fordham v. Southern Phenix Textiles, Inc.
  Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama· 1980-04-02· cited 45×
• Stevens v. Deaton Truck Line, Inc.
  Supreme Court of Alabama· 1951-10-11· cited 38×
• Ford v. Mitcham
  Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama· 1974-07-17· cited 25×
• Deaton Truck Line, Inc. v. Acker
  Supreme Court of Alabama· 1954-06-30· cited 24×
• Harbin v. United States Steel Corp.
  Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama· 1978-03-08· cited 24×
• C. E. Adams & Co. v. Harrell
  Supreme Court of Alabama· 1952-01-17· cited 19×
• Dees v. Daleville Florist
  Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama· 1981-12-16· cited 19×
• Hays v. Deaton Truck Line, Inc.
  Supreme Court of Alabama· 1956-01-12· cited 19×
• Craig v. Decatur Petroleum Haulers, Inc.
  Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama· 1976-11-10· cited 18×
• DALE MOTELS, INCORPORATED v. Crittenden
  Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama· 1972-11-01· cited 14×
• White v. Henshaw
  Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama· 1978-11-01· cited 12×
• Ex Parte Decatur Petroleum Haulers, Inc.
  Supreme Court of Alabama· 1977-01-07· cited 9×
• Dennis v. Gamble's, Inc.
  Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama· 1980-10-01· cited 8×
• Curry v. Interstate Express, Inc.
  Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama· 1991-05-03· cited 7×
• Curry v. Interstate Express, Inc.
  Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama· 1991-11-22· cited 3×