· 8/8/1991
Curry v. Del Priore
Citations
- 941 F.2d 730
- 91 Daily Journal DAR 9670
- 91 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 6320
- 1991 U.S. App. LEXIS 17969
- 57 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 40,915
- 56 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1010
- 1991 WL 148310
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- adopting rule that post-judgment interest begins to accrue when court enters judgment setting amount of fees owed based upon reasoning in Kaiser Aluminum
- “Any available postjudgment interest began to accrue on . . . the date the fees were meaningfully ascertained and included in a final, appealable judgment.”
- “Any available postjudgment interest began to accrue on April 22, 1991, the date the fees were meaningfully ascertained and included in a final, appealable judgment.”
- “It is undisputed that a plaintiff generally may not double recover damages.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Skopil, Tang, Thompson
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.