Currelly v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that a rule 3.850 motion alleging the plea agreement was violated when the movant was not given jail credit was facially sufficient and that the attachments to the order did not conclusively refute the claim
• “We conclude that the trial court should have treated this motion as a postconviction relief motion . . . and addressed all three grounds presented.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Barber v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2003-08-13· cited 1×
• Schrack v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2007-05-23· cited 1×
• Seraphin v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2016-06-01
• ANDRES AMBROSIO DUQUESNE v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2021-04-21