Court of Appeals of Maryland· 3/14/1994
Curran v. Price
Citations
- 638 A.2d 93
- 334 Md. 149
- 1994 Md. LEXIS 39
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that the required records doctrine was not applicable to Maryland’s “Son of Sam” statute because the statute was not regulatory but concerned an inherently criminal area
- holding that if a statute is susceptible to two reasonable interpretations, one of which would involve a decision as to its constitutionality, the preferred construction is the one which avoids the constitutional question
- holding that if a statute is susceptible to two reasonable interpretations, one of which would involve a decision as to its constitutionality, the preferred construction is the one which avoids the constitutional question
- discussing \heavy burden\ imposed on speech by initial review process of Maryland's Son of Sam statute
- “[A] person may not claim the privilege based on Incrimination that may result from the contents or nature of the thing demanded.’ ”
- “If a statute is susceptible of two reasonable interpretations, one of which would involve a decision as to its constitutionality, the preferred construction is that which avoids the determination of constitutionality”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Bell, Charles, McAuliffe, Murphy, Robert, Rodowsky
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
41 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Lockshin v. SemskerCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2010-01-12· cited 244×
- State v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2003-05-09· cited 144×
- Galloway v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2001-09-19· cited 77×
- Housing Authority v. BennettCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2000-06-06· cited 54×
- Bouchard v. PriceSupreme Court of Rhode Island· 1997-05-05· cited 54×
- Outmezguine v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1994-06-03· cited 49×
- R.A. Ponte Architects, Ltd. v. Investors' Alert, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland· 2004-08-26· cited 40×
- Harryman v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2000-06-29· cited 30×
- Young v. Anne Arundel CountyCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2002-09-11· cited 29×
- MARYCLE, LLC. v. First Choice Internet, Inc.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2006-01-26· cited 28×
- Edwards Systems Technology v. CorbinCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2004-02-10· cited 28×
- VNA Hospice of Md. v. DEPT. OF HEALTH AND MENTAL HYGIENECourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2008-12-11· cited 27×
- Maryland-National Capital Park & Planning Commission v. AndersonCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2005-09-30· cited 24×
- Blitz v. Beth Isaac Adas Israel CongregationCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1997-05-06· cited 24×
- Rouse-Fairwood Limited Partnership v. Supervisor of Assessments of Prince George's CountyCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1998-04-07· cited 23×
- NEFEDRO v. Montgomery CountyCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2010-06-10· cited 22×
- Heartwood 88, Inc. v. Montgomery CountyCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2004-04-14· cited 22×
- Abrams v. LamoneCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2007-03-26· cited 20×
- In Re Roberto D.B.Court of Appeals of Maryland· 2007-05-16· cited 20×
- Abington Center Associates Ltd. Partnership v. Baltimore CountyCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1997-05-29· cited 18×
Cites
30 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Ward v. Rock Against RacismSupreme Court· 1989-08-30· cited 3,406×
- Members of the City Council of Los Angeles v. Taxpayers for VincentSupreme Court· 1984-05-15· cited 2,188×
- R. A. v. v. City of St. PaulSupreme Court· 1992-06-22· cited 2,052×
- Fisher v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1976-04-21· cited 2,033×
- Clark v. Community for Creative Non-ViolenceSupreme Court· 1984-06-29· cited 1,847×
- City of Renton v. Playtime Theatres, Inc.Supreme Court· 1986-04-21· cited 1,818×
- Near v. Minnesota Ex Rel. OlsonSupreme Court· 1931-06-01· cited 1,633×
- Freedman v. MarylandSupreme Court· 1965-03-01· cited 1,485×
- Marchetti v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1968-01-29· cited 1,283×
- Bantam Books, Inc. v. SullivanSupreme Court· 1963-02-18· cited 1,188×
- Grosso v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1968-01-29· cited 947×
- Riley v. National Federation of Blind of North Carolina, Inc.Supreme Court· 1988-06-29· cited 913×
- Consolidated Edison Co. of New York v. Public Service CommissionSupreme Court· 1980-06-20· cited 838×
- Simon & Schuster, Inc. v. Members of the New York State Crime Victims BoardSupreme Court· 1991-12-10· cited 673×
- Haynes v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1968-01-29· cited 601×
- Shapiro v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1948-10-11· cited 599×
- Kaczorowski v. Mayor of BaltimoreCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1987-05-15· cited 588×
- Minneapolis Star & Tribune Co. v. Minnesota Commissioner of RevenueSupreme Court· 1983-03-29· cited 503×
- Arkansas Writers' Project, Inc. v. RaglandSupreme Court· 1987-04-22· cited 472×
- Albertson v. Subversive Activities Control BoardSupreme Court· 1966-01-17· cited 333×
Other cases named Curran v. Price
1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.