Skip to main content
· 2/28/2007

Curran v. Camden National Corp.

Citations

  • 477 F. Supp. 2d 247
  • 40 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 2449
  • 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14546
  • 2007 WL 625160

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “there is no practical difference between a grant of a Rule 12(b)(6) motion to dismiss and a denial of a motion to amend based on futility”
  • appellate court will not affirm denial of leave to amend “‘[u]nless there appears to be an adequate reason for the denial,’” such as undue delay, bad faith, dilatory motive, futility of amendment or prejudice

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Woodcock

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.