Curran Contracting Co. v. Woodland Hills Development Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the defendants were diligent where they requested the identities of persons having knowledge of the allegations in the complaint
• listing the above factors along with an additional factor of “the nature of the testimony”
• although some factors weighed in adverse party’s favor, barring testimony of opinion witness was still not warranted
• although some factors weighed in adverse party's favor, barring testimony of opinion witness was still not warranted

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).