Curragh Queensland Mining Ltd. v. Dresser Industries, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the plaintiff failed to prove a significant public impact because, in part, it \was neither economically vulnerable nor unsophisticated in matters pertaining to\ the contemplated transaction
• holding that the defendant's alleged misrepresentations did not significantly impact the public because, despite advertising to more than 3,000 companies, only a few of those companies could have purchased its product
• no public impact where seller advertised costly mining equipment to about 3000 companies, but very few could afford to purchase it

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).