Curnutt v. Scott Melvin Transport, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• affirming the circuit court’s denial of a Rule 74.04(f) motion in part because the parties were less than diligent in initiating discov ery, because they had failed to file a motion to compel, and because they had not attempted to depose witnesses

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).