Curley v. Wilcox
Citations
- 225 N.E.3d 1241
- 2023 Ohio 3507
Syllabus
The trial court did not err in refusing to dismiss prospective jurors for cause solely on the basis that they were policyholders of appellee's liability insurance company, which paid for appellee's expert. The jury verdict in favor of appellant was against the manifest weight of the evidence because there was no evidence submitted at trial on which the jury could reasonably have calculated an amount of damages that was not inherently speculative. Judgment affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded for a new trial on damages.
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that California law governed the question of relation back, not federal law
- relative culpability and relative litigation time relevant
- members of school board were public officials
- relative culpability and relative litigation time relevant
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Lewis
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.