Curley, Inc. v. United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that both Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(4) and Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(2) were inapplicable to the appeal at issue
• \[C]onclusory allegations of scienter are sufficient 'if supported by facts giving rise to a \strong inference\ of fraudulent intent.' \
• finding jurisdiction under Multi-employer Pension Plan Amendments Act (\MPPAA\)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).