Curinton v. State of Florida

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• reasoning that the district court is best able to decide certain types of parameters in public institutional reform litigation and, thus, is owed deference when the scope of the parties’ original bargain is not at issue
• reasoning that the district court is best able to decide certain types of parameters in public institutional reform litigation and, thus, is owed deference when the scope of the parties' original bargain is not at issue
• deference to trial court's decision appropriate where its decision stems from its long-term supervision of a remedial consent decree in a public law context
• deference to trial court’s decision appropriate where its decision stems from its long-term supervision of a remedial consent decree in a public law context
• \ordinary contract principles\ and standards of review should be used to interpret \the scope of the parties' original bargain\ in public consent decree
• “When the parties stipulate that the action is a class action and clearly define the members of the class, and the court enters judgment pursuant to the stipulated terms, this may sufficiently imply certification for purposes of Fed. R. Civ. P. 23(c)(1)”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).