Skip to main content

Curiano v. Suozzi

Citations

  • 63 N.Y.2d 113
  • 469 N.E.2d 1324
  • 480 N.Y.S.2d 466
  • 1984 N.Y. LEXIS 4604

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • providing that the challenged “regularly issued process” may be “either civil or criminal”
  • explaining that the “sole” motivation for the defendant’s actions must be one of malevolence
  • dismissing malicious abuse of process claim because Plaintiffs warrantless arrest “did not involve legal process.”
  • “[T]he institution of a civil action by summons and complaint is not legally considered process capable of being abused.”
  • “[the Prima Facie Tort] should not ‘become a catch-all alternative for every cause of action which cannot stand on its legs.’ ”
  • \A malicious motive alone ... does not give rise to a cause of action for abuse of process.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Simons

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

366 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

18 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named Curiano v. Suozzi

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.