Cureton v. United States Marshal Service

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that the plaintiff’s motion for leave to amend was unnecessary because the plaintiff sought leave within the timeframe for an amendment as of right under Rule 15(a)(1)
• finding contradictory claim amounts between the letter demand, demand within the Form 95, and the complaint
• dismissing FTCA claim where plaintiff did not satisfy presentment requirement because her claim form contained “contradictory claim amounts” and she “never responded to the defendants’ request for clarification”
• dismissing claim as unexhausted when administrative claim did not provide “sum certain” in damages
• describing the employees’ roles and tenures at the Federal Reserve building
• “When a plaintiff files a response to a motion to dismiss but fails to address certain arguments made by the defendant, the court may treat those arguments as conceded, even when the result is dismissal of the case.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).