Curet-Velazquez v. Acemla De Puerto Rico, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that appellants could not claim unfair surprise based on opposing party's reference to documents introduced by appellants
• noting the utility of statutory damages where a defendant has refused to cooperate in damages calculations
• upholding maximum statutory damages award because defendants \did not provide comprehensive and accurate [accounting] reports\ showing how they profited by selling plaintiff's work
• noting the utility of statutory damages where a defendant has refused to cooperate in damages calculations
• affirming admission of expert testimony regarding documents that were not included in his report
• “appellants cannot claim that the reference to these new documents was an unfair surprise because they themselves prepared and disclosed the documents.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).