· 1/3/2007
Curcio v. Hartford Financial Services Group
Citations
- 469 F. Supp. 2d 18
- 40 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 2025
- 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 390
- 2007 WL 26856
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- denying motion to remand on ERISA preemption grounds where plaintiff’s quantum meruit claim “unequivocally [sought] severance benefits” under an ERISA-governed severance plan
- “Accordingly, plaintiff’s quantum meruit claim . . . falls within the scope of ERISA § 502(a)(1)(B) and is therefore completely preempted . . . , and plaintiff’s Complaint was thus removable to federal court.
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Arterton
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.