Skip to main content
· 9/6/1966

Curbello v. Vaughn

Citations

  • 417 P.2d 881
  • 76 N.M. 687

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the trial court retains exclusive jurisdiction until entry of a proper judgment or order
  • stating that where the district court had entered findings and conclusions but had not entered an order or judgment carrying out the findings and conclusions, no final order had been entered in the case for purposes of appeal
  • stating that where the district court had entered findings and conclusions but had not entered an order or judgment carrying out the findings and conclusions, no final order had been entered in the case for purposes of appeal
  • stating that where the district 13 court had entered findings and conclusions but had not entered an order or judgment 14 carrying out the findings and conclusions, no final order had been entered in the case 15 for purposes of appeal
  • trial court retains exclusive jurisdiction of a case until entry of a proper judgment or order

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Compton, Chavez, Noble

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.