Skip to main content
· 12/31/2015

Cuprite Mine Partners v. John Anderson

Citations

  • 809 F.3d 548
  • 2015 U.S. App. LEXIS 22922
  • 2015 WL 9583526

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding the acceptance of an existing offer was “a reasonable way . . . to structure the partition sale” where the opposing party’s suggestion that auctioning the property would bring greater value was speculative
  • applying an abuse of discretion standard when reviewing a sale conducted pursuant to A.R.S. § 12-1218
  • “Under the Erie doctrine, federal 27 courts sitting in diversity apply state substantive law and federal procedural rules.”
  • “[F]ederal 24 courts sitting in diversity apply state substantive law.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Fernandez, Smith, Morris

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.