Cupps v. Traction Co.
Citations
- 13 Pa. Super. 630
- 1900 Pa. Super. LEXIS 214
Syllabus
<p>Street railway — Contributory negligence — Province of court and jury.</p> <p>The case discloses contributory negligence where the situation presented is that of a man who looked and listened before he started his team, but who, in the middle of the block, not at a street crossing, drove diagonally across the tracks of the trolley company, in front of a moving car (which before starting he observed to be approaching at a distance of 321 feet) and who after starting his team, did not look again until the car was practically upon him. Under such circumstances there was no right of recovery.</p>
Judges: Beaver, Evans, Orlady, Porter, Rice
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
3 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Ely v. Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis RailwaySupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1893-11-06· cited 89×
- Whitman v. Pennsylvania R. R.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1893-07-19· cited 22×
- Smith v. Electric Traction Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1898-07-21· cited 19×
- Wilson v. North Side Traction Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1899-05-18· cited 2×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.