Skip to main content
· 11/21/1913

Cunningham's Administrator v. Central Kentucky Traction Co.

Citations

  • 156 Ky. 30
  • 160 S.W. 767
  • 1913 Ky. LEXIS 375

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that use of famous mark on a website sufficient to establish a claim for dilution by blurring
  • finding that Yelp’s 3 Terms of Service is a contract
  • awarding $45,000 in statutory damages where plaintiff had 4 requested $2,000,000
  • “For ease of analysis, the merits of Plaintiffs substantive claims and sufficiency of 7 the complaint are considered together”
  • “For ease of analysis, the merits of Plaintiffs substantive claims and sufficiency 6 of the complaint are considered together”
  • “For ease of analysis, the merits of Plaintiffs substantive claims and sufficiency of the complaint 18 are considered together”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Chiep, Hobson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.