Skip to main content

Cunningham v. State

Citations

  • 877 S.W.2d 310
  • 1994 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 61
  • 1994 WL 201053

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that testimony regarding appellant‘s out-of-court statements is admissible as an admission of a party opponent
  • holding that testimony regarding appellant’s out-of-court statements is admissible as an admission of a party opponent
  • disagreeing with lower court that consistent hearsay or testimony from the defendant is not a valid consideration in assessing trustworthiness
  • disagreeing with lower court that consistent hearsay or testimony from the defendant is not a valid consideration in assessing trustworthiness
  • affirming the court of appeals' judgment in a situation where \the circumstances indicating trustworthiness were at least equally met by circumstances indicating lack of trustworthiness\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Maloney, McCormick

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

60 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.