Cunningham v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding appeal from nunc pro tunc order “is limited to the validity of the nunc pro tunc entry”
• “In cases such as this the right of appeal, if any, is limited to the validity of the nunc pro tunc entry. Appellant is not entitled to appeal from the conviction itself . . . .”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

10 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Blanton, Donald Gene
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2012-06-27· cited 235×
• Jones v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1990-06-20· cited 133×
• Moore v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1969-11-05· cited 31×
• Van Johnson v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 3rd Dist. (Austin)· 1998-08-31
• Robbie Loftin v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 2nd Dist. (Fort Worth)· 2012-11-15
• Rohn M. Weatherly v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 2nd Dist. (Fort Worth)· 2021-01-07
• in Re Paul Eugene Denley
  Tex. App. Ct., 14th Dist. (Houston)· 2022-07-07
• Troy Eugene Welch v. the State of Texas
  Tex. App. Ct., 10th Dist. (Waco)· 2022-10-12
• Carl Clifton Carnley v. the State of Texas
  Tex. App. Ct., 10th Dist. (Waco)· 2023-11-30
• Troy Eugene Welch v. the State of Texas
  Tex. App. Ct., 10th Dist. (Waco)· 2023-12-14

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Johnston v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1959-03-11· cited 15×
• Bennett v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1917-02-28· cited 10×
• Elliott v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1951-01-03· cited 4×
• Lewis v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1950-12-20· cited 4×