Cunningham v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “A statute which forbids the doing of an act in terms so vague that people of common intelligence must necessarily guess as to its meaning violates the first essential of due process, the notion of fair notice or warning.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• City of Las Vegas v. Eighth Judicial District Court of the State of Nevada
  Nevada Supreme Court· 2002-12-20· cited 38×
• Sereika v. State
  Nevada Supreme Court· 1998-02-26· cited 28×
• Erwin v. State
  Nevada Supreme Court· 1995-12-19· cited 27×
• Sheriff v. Burdg
  Nevada Supreme Court· 2002-12-20· cited 18×
• Sheriff v. Vlasak
  Nevada Supreme Court· 1995-01-25· cited 6×

Cites

1 case in this archive is cited by this case.

• Eaves v. Board of Clark County Commissioners
  Nevada Supreme Court· 1980-12-29· cited 14×