Cunningham v. Georgetown Homes, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• discussing the “unique . . . nature of cooperative living” and acknowledging that waiver of right to redemption in the occupancy agreement was enforceable
• Did not find the relationship between parties to be landlord-tenant but recognized that “when a member joins a cooperative, and signs an occupancy agreement, which contains certain conditions, she obligates herself to those conditions.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Ream v. YANKEE PARK HOMEOWNER'S ASS'N, INC.
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 2009-10-28· cited 13×
• Hoang v. Jamestown Homes, Inc.
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 2002-05-31· cited 12×
• Village Green Mutual Homes, Inc. v. Randolph
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 2000-10-11· cited 6×
• Bishop v. HOUSING AUTHORITY OF SOUTH BEND
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 2010-02-01· cited 4×
• Gvozdanovic v. Woodford Corporation
  Ohio Court of Appeals· 2000-05-19· cited 3×

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Kadera v. Superior Court
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1996-02-29· cited 19×
• PLAZA ROAD CO-OP., INC. v. Finn
  New Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1985-05-13· cited 18×
• Earl W. Jimerson Housing Co. v. Butler
  Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York· 1979-12-03· cited 15×
• Quality Management Services, Inc. v. Banker
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1997-08-22· cited 10×
• Jordan v. PLACER HOLDING COMPANY
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1994-04-29· cited 5×