Skip to main content
· 10/7/2013

Cunningham v. Chappell

Citations

  • 134 S. Ct. 169
  • 187 L. Ed. 2d 116
  • 82 U.S.L.W. 3183
  • 571 U.S. 867
  • 2013 WL 2904059
  • 2013 U.S. LEXIS 6835

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • recognizing that “injection therapies” and pain medications were “conservative pain management approaches” and discussing back surgery for degenerative disc disease
  • “ALJs are not permitted to cherry-pick evidence . . . to support their conclusions, without engaging with the evidence that weighs against their findings.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.