Cunningham Lindsey Claims Management, Inc. v. Snyder

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that carrier’s approval of second preau-thorization request did “not alter the fact that under the governing statutes and administrative rules, resolution of any question regarding need for surgery” as to the first preauthorization request “rested solely with the [agency]”
• holding that carrier’s approval of second preauthorization request did “not alter the fact that under the governing statutes and administrative rules, resolution of any question regarding need for surgery” as to the first preauthorization request “rested solely with the [agency]”
• “As a result of waiver, Snyder has not and cannot exhaust administrative remedies regarding this issue.”
• “As a result of waiver, Snyder has not and cannot exhaust administrative remedies regarding this issue.”
• “The absence of a dispute regarding the second preauthorization request does not alter the fact that ... resolution of any question regarding the need for surgery in December 2002 rested exclusively with the TWCC.”
• “[T]he question of whether the first preauthorization was wrongfully denied—and hence, whether Snyder was damaged by a wrongful delay—can only be answered by first determining whether spinal surgery was medically necessary [when first requested.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).