Seventh Circuit· 1/22/2010
Cunningham Charter Corp. v. Learjet, Inc.
Citations
- 592 F.3d 805
- 2010 U.S. App. LEXIS 1452
- 2010 WL 199627
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- explaining that subsection (d)(8) at most suggests that a class \ may be certified eventually\ (emphasis added)
- explaining that the time-of-filing rule avoids “shunt[ing cases] between court systems” because “litigation is not ping- pong”
- explaining that subsection (d)(8) at most suggests that a class \ may be certified eventually\ (emphasis added)
- explaining that subsection (d)(8) at most suggests that a class \may be certified eventually\ (emphasis added)
- noting some “exceptions to the 1 and amending away jurisdiction in a subsequent pleading
- noting that this rule applies in CAFA cases
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Posner, Coffey, Flaum
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
28 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Pilgrim v. Universal Health Card, LLCSixth Circuit· 2011-11-10· cited 164×
- United Steel, Paper & Forestry, Rubber, Manufacturing, Energy, Allied Industrial & Service Workers International Union v. Shell Oil Co.Ninth Circuit· 2010-04-21· cited 132×
- Morrison v. YTB International, Inc.Seventh Circuit· 2011-07-27· cited 120×
- Greenberger v. GEICO General InsuranceSeventh Circuit· 2011-01-10· cited 108×
- Carroll v. Stryker Corp.Seventh Circuit· 2011-09-06· cited 98×
- Back Doctors Ltd. v. Metropolitan Property & Casualty InsuranceSeventh Circuit· 2011-04-01· cited 97×
- Mendez v. Perla DentalSeventh Circuit· 2011-05-24· cited 70×
- In Re Burlington Northern Santa Fe Railway Co.Seventh Circuit· 2010-05-19· cited 66×
- Buetow v. A.L.S. Enterprises, Inc.Eighth Circuit· 2011-08-18· cited 63×
- Metz v. Unizan BankSixth Circuit· 2011-08-19· cited 42×
- Bergquist v. MANN BRACKEN, LLPSeventh Circuit· 2010-01-26· cited 33×
- Barbara Williams v. Employers Mutual Casualty Co.Eighth Circuit· 2017-01-12· cited 32×
- In Touch Concepts, Inc. v. Cellco PartnershipS.D. New York· 2013-06-04· cited 27×
- Townsquare Media, Inc. v. BrillSeventh Circuit· 2011-07-21· cited 26×
- Thorogood v. SEARS, ROEBUCK AND CO.Seventh Circuit· 2010-02-12· cited 17×
- Wright Transportation, Inc. v. Pilot CorporationEleventh Circuit· 2016-11-22· cited 16×
- Jarrett v. Panasonic Corp. of North AmericaE.D. Arkansas· 2013-06-21· cited 13×
- Western Glove Works v. XMH Corp. 1Seventh Circuit· 2011-07-26· cited 10×
- Hughes v. Ester C Co.E.D. New York· 2018-09-04· cited 10×
- Gagasoules v. MBF Leasing LLCE.D. New York· 2012-09-29· cited 7×
Cites
7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Saint Paul Mercury Indemnity Co. v. Red Cab Co.Supreme Court· 1938-02-28· cited 3,971×
- Church of Scientology of California v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1992-11-16· cited 1,710×
- Rockwell International Corp. v. United StatesSupreme Court· 2007-03-27· cited 664×
- Vega v. T-MOBILE USA, INC.Eleventh Circuit· 2009-04-07· cited 478×
- In the Matter of Shell Oil CompanySeventh Circuit· 1992-08-06· cited 155×
- Terrell Walters and Joseph Ganci, on Behalf of Themselves and All Others Similarly Situated v. James EdgarSeventh Circuit· 1999-01-20· cited 114×
- Bullard v. Burlington Northern Santa Fe Railway Co.Seventh Circuit· 2008-08-01· cited 50×
Other cases named Cunningham Charter Corp. v. Learjet, Inc.
2 other CourtListener records share this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.