Skip to main content
Seventh Circuit· 1/22/2010

Cunningham Charter Corp. v. Learjet, Inc.

Citations

  • 592 F.3d 805
  • 2010 U.S. App. LEXIS 1452
  • 2010 WL 199627

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that subsection (d)(8) at most suggests that a class \ may be certified eventually\ (emphasis added)
  • explaining that the time-of-filing rule avoids “shunt[ing cases] between court systems” because “litigation is not ping- pong”
  • explaining that subsection (d)(8) at most suggests that a class \ may be certified eventually\ (emphasis added)
  • explaining that subsection (d)(8) at most suggests that a class \may be certified eventually\ (emphasis added)
  • noting some “exceptions to the 1 and amending away jurisdiction in a subsequent pleading
  • noting that this rule applies in CAFA cases

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Posner, Coffey, Flaum

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

28 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named Cunningham Charter Corp. v. Learjet, Inc.

2 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.