Cunningham and Company, Inc. v. Consolidated Realty Management, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that, “[s]uch statutory arguments can be considered to fill in gaps in contracts”
• discussing the interplay between state substantive law and Rule 56 in a diversity contract case
• allowing “arguments based on the legislative history,” and noting that “[s]uch statutory arguments [could] be considered to fill in gaps in contracts” because “it appear[ed] from the record that the parties lifted language from the statute without discussion.”
• “The roles of judge and jury in the interpretation of contracts are set by federal law, even in diversity cases.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).