Supreme Court of Connecticut· 8/10/1982
Cummock v. Cummock
Citations
- 188 Conn. 30
- 448 A.2d 204
- 1982 Conn. LEXIS 562
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that loss of child support payments upon transfer of custody constitutes one factor for trial court to consider in determining whether substantial change in circum- stances has occurred warranting modification of ali- mony
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Peters, Healey, Parskey, Armentajsto, Shea
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
5 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Lev v. LevConnecticut Appellate Court· 1987-04-28· cited 18×
- Scott v. ScottSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1983-08-02· cited 13×
- Serby v. SerbyConnecticut Appellate Court· 1985-07-02· cited 9×
- Nicholson v. NicholsonConnecticut Appellate Court· 2001-11-13· cited 2×
- Coury v. CouryConnecticut Appellate Court· 2015-11-17
Cites
7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- McGuinness v. McGuinnessSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1981-07-21· cited 128×
- Noce v. NoceSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1980-06-03· cited 52×
- Cummock v. CummockSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1980-04-01· cited 49×
- Tutalo v. TutaloSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1982-06-01· cited 39×
- Benson v. BensonSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1982-06-22· cited 22×
- Friedly v. FriedlySupreme Court of Connecticut· 1978-02-21· cited 11×
- Moore v. MooreSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1982-07-20· cited 8×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.