Skip to main content
· 7/17/2006

Cummins Incorporated (Formerly Known as Cummins Engine Company) v. United States

Citations

  • 454 F.3d 1361
  • 28 I.T.R.D. (BNA) 1257
  • 2006 U.S. App. LEXIS 17928
  • 2006 WL 1975418

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • emphasizing that “when the nature of the merchandise is undisputed ... the classification issue collapses entirely into a question of law”
  • emphasizing that “when the nature of the merchandise is undisputed . . . the classification issue collapses entirely into a ques- tion of law”
  • unfinished crankshaft with essential character of crankshaft and intended for use only in producing a finished crankshaft
  • “[w]hen the nature of the merchandise is undisputed . . . the classification issue collapses entirely into a question of law”
  • “[w]hen the nature of the merchandise is undisputed . . . the classification issue collapses entirely into a question of law”
  • “[w]hen the nature of the merchandise is undisputed . . . the classification issue collapses entirely into a question of law”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Newman, Mayer, Rader

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.