· 7/17/2006
Cummins Incorporated (Formerly Known as Cummins Engine Company) v. United States
Citations
- 454 F.3d 1361
- 28 I.T.R.D. (BNA) 1257
- 2006 U.S. App. LEXIS 17928
- 2006 WL 1975418
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- emphasizing that “when the nature of the merchandise is undisputed ... the classification issue collapses entirely into a question of law”
- emphasizing that “when the nature of the merchandise is undisputed . . . the classification issue collapses entirely into a ques- tion of law”
- unfinished crankshaft with essential character of crankshaft and intended for use only in producing a finished crankshaft
- “[w]hen the nature of the merchandise is undisputed . . . the classification issue collapses entirely into a question of law”
- “[w]hen the nature of the merchandise is undisputed . . . the classification issue collapses entirely into a question of law”
- “[w]hen the nature of the merchandise is undisputed . . . the classification issue collapses entirely into a question of law”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Newman, Mayer, Rader
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.