· 7/18/2005
Cummins, Inc. v. Superior Court
Citations
- 115 P.3d 98
- 30 Cal. Rptr. 3d 823
- 36 Cal. 4th 478
- 2005 Daily Journal DAR 8551
- 2005 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 6264
- 2005 Cal. LEXIS 7605
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- concluding “that subdivision (d)(2) of section 1793.2, like subdivision (d)(1) ... is limited to new motor vehicles sold in this state” (emphasis added)
- Song-Beverly Act did not apply to moto-rhome sold in Idaho and subsequently brought into California
- Song-Beverly Act did not apply to motorhome sold in Idaho and subsequently brought into California
- Song-Beverly Act did not apply to motorhome sold in Idaho and subsequently brought into California
- Song– Beverly Act did not apply to motorhome sold in Idaho and subsequently brought into California
- Song-Beverly was enacted “to address the difficulties 19 faced by consumers in enforcing express warranties.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: George
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.