Skip to main content
· 7/18/2005

Cummins, Inc. v. Superior Court

Citations

  • 115 P.3d 98
  • 30 Cal. Rptr. 3d 823
  • 36 Cal. 4th 478
  • 2005 Daily Journal DAR 8551
  • 2005 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 6264
  • 2005 Cal. LEXIS 7605

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding “that subdivision (d)(2) of section 1793.2, like subdivision (d)(1) ... is limited to new motor vehicles sold in this state” (emphasis added)
  • Song-Beverly Act did not apply to moto-rhome sold in Idaho and subsequently brought into California
  • Song-Beverly Act did not apply to motorhome sold in Idaho and subsequently brought into California
  • Song-Beverly Act did not apply to motorhome sold in Idaho and subsequently brought into California
  • Song– Beverly Act did not apply to motorhome sold in Idaho and subsequently brought into California
  • Song-Beverly was enacted “to address the difficulties 19 faced by consumers in enforcing express warranties.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: George

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.