Cummins Engine Co. v. United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that in Odessa Union “the traditional requirement of irreparable injury was inapplicable because the parties conceded that the federal statute involved was violated”
• treating verified complaint as affidavit opposing 20 summary judgment where allegations based on plaintiff’s personal knowledge
• “We . . . overrule Tomco and El Farra on this point . . . .”
• “ ‘[JJust and proper’ is another way of saying ‘appropriate’ or ‘equitable.’ ”
• threshold showing of likelihood of success can be made by producing some evidence

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).