Skip to main content
· 9/15/1925

Cummings v. New York State Railways

Citations

  • 214 A.D. 849

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • although prospective, constitutional amendment annulled any statute then in force or which might thereafter be passed inconsistent with its provisions
  • although prospective, constitutional amendment annulled any statute then in force or which might thereafter be passed inconsistent with its provisions
  • constitution is law absolutely controlling the legislature, executive, and judicial departments and its provisions “take effect on laws already passed as well as to those to be enacted in the future”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.