Skip to main content
· 11/16/2001

Cummings v. McIntire

Citations

  • 271 F.3d 341
  • 2001 U.S. App. LEXIS 24571
  • 2001 WL 1414592

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • collecting First Circuit cases with fact patterns that did not shock the conscience
  • stating, “A look at the facts underlying other substantive due process claims helps place this case into perspective and reinforces our conclusion that [the defendant’s] conduct was not of constitutional dimension,” and then listing the above summaries and case citations
  • stating, “A look at the facts underlying other substantive due process claims helps place this case into perspective and reinforces our conclusion that [the defendant’s] conduct was not of constitutional dimension,” and then listing the above summaries and case citations
  • “[N]egligent conduct is ‘categorically beneath the threshold of constitutional due process....’” (quoting Lewis, 523 U.S. at 849, 118 S.Ct. 1708)
  • deliberate indifference may be enough in “custodial” situations

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Lynch, Coffin, Young

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.