Cumbie v. City of Milton

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “nearly two years” after hiring date was not “upon entering into” service
• holding that the statutory presumption did not apply because no physical was done, and noting in dissent that the first city-sponsored physical of claimant was done \nearly two years after claimant's entry into service\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).