Cumberland Truck Equipment Co. v. Detroit Diesel Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that Third Circuit precedent supported “allowing [s]ection 12’s venue clause to be supplemented for alien but not domestic defendants.”
• observing defendants agree that venue would be proper in transferee court
• observing defendants agree that venue would be proper in transferee court
• “[A] court has the power to transfer a case pursuant to venue transfer statutes without possessing personal jurisdiction over the defendants.” (citing Goldlawr, Inc., v. Heiman, 369 U.S. 463, 466 (1962))
• “[A] court has the power to transfer a case pursuant to venue transfer statutes without possessing personal jurisdiction over the defendants.” (citing Goldlawr, Inc., v. Heiman, 369 U.S. 463, 466 (1962))
• “The Third Circuit’s decision in Automotive Refinishing suggests that this Circuit would . . . allow[] Section 12’s venue clause to be supplemented for alien but not domestic defendants. Under this approach, Section [1391(c)(3

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).