Cumberland Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. Logsdon

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “the right Plaintiffs say Defendants violated — the right to bear arms for the purpose of self-defense outside the home— is not clearly established under the Second Amendment”
• noting that the relevant inquiry is whether those who view the conduct understand the message that plaintiffs were trying to convey or that there was a message of any sort involved

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).