Skip to main content
· 11/15/1906

Cumberland Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. Hicks

Citations

  • 89 Miss. 270
  • 42 So. 285

Syllabus

<p>Telephones. Damages. Evidence. Physician. Loss of Practice.</p> <p>In an action by a physician for -damages- -resulting from the wrongful cutting out of his telephone he cannot prove loss of practice by testifying to conversations with divers persons wherein they claimed that they tried, during the -time his telephone was cut out, to call him professionally over the telephone, but, being unable to do so, had procured the services of another physician-.</p>

Judges: Calhoon

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.