Culp v. United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting the house was missing a rear door, its windows were shattered, and the interior was in “shambles”
• observing that the government must prove a “general intent to enter”
• affirming because “officers could reasonably conclude that appellant knowingly entered ‘against the will of . . . the person lawfully in charge’”
• affirming because “officers could reasonably conclude that appellant knowingly entered ‘against the will of ... the person lawfully in charge’ ”
• noting boarded windows gives sufficient warning an abandoned building should not be entered
• noting boarded windows gives sufficient warning an abandoned building should not be entered

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).