· 1/13/1857
Cully v. Imell
Citations
- 8 Ind. 456
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- finding district court did not abuse its discretion in denying motion to amend where the motion “sought to allege new, unrelated claims against new defendants.”
- denying proposed amendment adding new unrelated claims against new defendants (citation omitted)
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.