Skip to main content
· 1/13/1857

Cully v. Imell

Citations

  • 8 Ind. 456

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding district court did not abuse its discretion in denying motion to amend where the motion “sought to allege new, unrelated claims against new defendants.”
  • denying proposed amendment adding new unrelated claims against new defendants (citation omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.