Skip to main content
· 7/2/2007

Cullum v. Cullum

Citations

  • 160 P.3d 231
  • 215 Ariz. 352

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that appellate courts “will not consider argument posited without authority”
  • noting that “a party cannot argue on appeal legal issues not raised” in the trial court
  • noting that “a party cannot argue on appeal legal issues not raised” in the trial court
  • explaining that the purpose of the guidelines is to give the court and the parties a starting point for discussion and are not intended to “replace the court’s obligation to consider the specific evidence and statutory factors”
  • noting that appellate courts “will not consider arguments posited without authority”
  • noting that appellate courts “will not consider arguments posited without authority.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Kessler, Portley, Irvine

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.