Culley v. County of Elko

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that “[t]he district court correctly held that the court must determine whether substantial impairment of access has been established as a matter of law in inverse condemnation cases”
• concluding that \[t]he district court correctly held that the court must determine whether substantial impairment of access has been established as a matter of law in inverse condemnation cases\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).