Culler v. Blue Ridge Electric Cooperative, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• emphasizing that the doctrine of employment at-will in its pure form allows an employer to discharge an employee for good reason, no reason, or bad reason without incurring liability
• emphasizing that the doctrine of employment at-will in its pure form allows an employer to discharge an employee for good reason, no reason, or bad reason without incurring liability
• finding employee would have a cause of action for wrongful discharge if he was discharged because he refused to contribute to a political action fund
• relying on Vanderhoff in finding that the “plaintiffs’ vaccine refusal likely is not the type of politically-based belief or opinion contemplated by § 16- 17-560”
• stating an action in tort is generally an action at law
• employee was terminated after he refused to contribute to political action fund, and his termination violated S.C.Code Ann. § 16-17-560

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).